________________________________________________________
"FREEDOM of speech allows both intelligent and ignorant speakers the right to speak. . . even to rant if they wish; but, allowing psychologically deranged people to do so under the guise of "rational opinion" smells more like social illness than freedom of speech. Perhaps with a confused civilization in moral decline, it's normal to see such ugliness.
Under these circumstances, one has to view abominations like Rosie O'Donnell as just a sign of the times. . .no matter how depressing the thought, or repulsive the person. That any portion of society is exposed to her private madness is the fault of the media that promotes her. She is obviously unable to repair her genetics, or unwilling to medicate her psychosis."
____________________________________________________________________
If rap is music, then these 2 short paragraphs are light and lilting.
___________________________________________________________
A good personal experience with a recent surgery
__________________________________________________________
(Scroll down to the #3 entry on that page of the Philosophy Journal.)
__________________________________________________________________
SOMETIMES a statement crosses my mind that would fit a situation nicely. . . though the situation doesn't exist at the moment. Here's an example: " . . .That degree of stupidity is a dilemma. He'll never be smart enough to realize just how dumb he really is." OR
". . .He'll never be aware enough to recognize how unobservant he is." OR
". . .He'll never be informed enough to recognize how little he knows." etc.
Just one of those "phrase concepts" that would be handy to recall if you needed it. OR. . . Perhaps phrased in such a way as to stand on its own, with a twist: "God willing. . .I'll never be smart enough to realize just how stupid I am." Maybe a T-Shirt? What do you think?
_______________________________________________________________
I consider myself a car guy even though I don't own anything custom or collectible at present. I was raised to enjoy automotive form and function. Cars are, or can be, Art on Wheels for me. I also appreciate individual taste, but what I often see moving down the road these days hardly qualifies as "taste" at all. I see people driving 50 -80- 100,000 dollar automobiles with the most ridiculous wheels I've ever seen. Of course, there are Companies out there making these rims, so there's apparently some kind of mutual understanding going on; but my god, they look like rolling cartoons. It's possible that they're trying to display a sense of humor, but I don't think so. I think the only thing they're displaying is Seriously Bad Taste . . . at a cost of thousands I might add.
There'll be this beautiful automobile, beautiful interior, flawless paint job, gorgeous design lines. . . with oversized chrome-spoked or fingered and riveted wheels, so shiny and glittery that it actually makes the car look like a joke. You can't see the car for the wheels. If it's an SUV, I fully expect horn-beeping, red-nosed circus clowns to come piling out at the stop lights.
Decisions based on glitz, glitter and "Out Of Context Favoritism" affect me like sour notes, or fingernails on a blackboard, physical discomfort bordering on pain. (By "Out Of Context Favoritism" I mean for example: Say it's time to pick a color for some new contact lenses. . . Red is your favorite color, so that's what you go with).
Some dolt is bound to pipe up and say: "What is it with you. . .people can do what they want. Everybody has their own idea of what looks good. Are you some kind of snob?" All I can say in return is: "Apparently I am, and to be honest. . .I don't really care what anybody does. Even strange ideas can be entertaining. But if critical opinion isn't allowed. . . who is it that's being discriminatory? Enough of the civilized world is going to hell as it is . I can't seem to help but speak up for common sense decoration. . .at least. (Joseph Holbrook)
_________________________________________________________________
"If in a marriage or a relationship, it comes down to who thinks who is doing a favor for whom, then a scoreboard is required.. . .and scoreboards really only work in games, finance and wars."
____________________________________________________________
I made a personal vow last year to lay off talking so much about politics in this journal. I think it's healthier to concentrate on more positive observations. So, I've begun a personal Philosophy Journal (accessable from this page). Of course, you see how that works. Now I can still vent in this part of the Journal when I want and not feel guilty about it. (Unfortunately, it's not going to help my anger and depression over all the political crap. . . .so once again, I've utterly failed to fool myself.)
To cover a little of both: It's well worth the time to acquaint yourself with the Common Examples of LOGICAL FALLACY: (The Wikipedia link is below) Familiarize yourself with such things as: Appeal to pity, Appeal to tradition, Appeal to fear, Appeal to the majority, Biased samples, Argumentum ad populum etc., (read them all, they are usually only a paragraph or so a piece, plus it's fun to check where your weaknesses might lie). You may find, as I did, that for some reason the word "Politicians" keeps popping into your head.
Try not to be too demoralized as you confirm yet once again that: Politicians take advantage of a gullible public by using flaws in their ability to discern what are logical steps or conclusions in a statement, argument or debate. After your done, be sure to remind yourself how much we're supposed to trust them. That is why we keep hiring them, right?
_________________________________________
Religions advise you of what they say God wants you to think. Philosophies inform you of perspectives to consider.
__________________________________________